What Is 1932 National Board of Review Awards
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 14, 2026
Key Facts
- The 1932 National Board of Review Awards recognized films released between 1931 and 1932
- Best Picture was awarded to <em>Viva Villa!</em>, a biographical film about Mexican revolutionary Pancho Villa
- Fredric March won Best Actor for his dual role in <em>Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde</em>
- The National Board of Review has presented annual awards since 1930, making 1932 the third year of recognition
- No official Best Actress award was publicly listed for the 1932 ceremony
Overview
The 1932 National Board of Review Awards celebrated the finest achievements in American and international cinema during the 1931–1932 film season. As the third annual presentation by the National Board of Review (NBR), the event highlighted performances and productions that demonstrated artistic excellence and cultural significance during a transformative era in Hollywood.
Unlike later awards that evolved into televised ceremonies, the 1932 honors were announced quietly, reflecting the NBR's academic and critical mission. The selections were made by a panel of film experts, educators, and critics based in New York, emphasizing intellectual and moral standards in filmmaking. This early recognition helped shape the reputations of both films and performers during the transition from silent to sound cinema.
- Best Picture:Viva Villa! was honored for its bold portrayal of Mexican revolutionary Pancho Villa, directed by Jack Conway and produced by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
- Best Actor: Fredric March received top honors for his transformative performance as both Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in the RKO horror classic Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.
- Historical Context: The 1932 awards were announced during the Great Depression, a time when cinema provided vital escapism and social commentary for American audiences.
- Selection Process: The National Board of Review used a committee-based voting system, distinct from industry guilds, focusing on artistic merit rather than box office success.
- Legacy: These early NBR awards laid the foundation for its future role as a key precursor to the Academy Awards and a respected voice in film criticism.
How It Works
The National Board of Review operated independently of the film industry, using a rigorous evaluation process to select annual honorees. Its members reviewed films released in New York City during the eligibility period, prioritizing narrative strength, technical innovation, and moral integrity.
- Eligibility Window: Films released between January 1, 1931, and December 31, 1932, were considered for the 1932 awards, covering a two-year cinematic cycle.
- Judging Panel: A board of university professors, writers, and cultural critics convened to debate and vote on the year’s best films and performances.
- Best Picture:Viva Villa! stood out for its epic scale, historical subject matter, and innovative action sequences, including large-scale battle scenes.
- Best Actor: Fredric March’s win was notable for his physical transformation and psychological depth, a rare achievement in early sound horror films.
- Genre Recognition: The NBR acknowledged diverse genres, with Viva Villa! representing historical drama and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde exemplifying horror and moral allegory.
- Announcement Method: Winners were published in press releases rather than presented at a ceremony, reflecting the organization’s scholarly tone.
Comparison at a Glance
Below is a comparison of the 1932 NBR Awards with other major film honors of the era:
| Award | Best Picture Winner (1932) | Best Actor Winner | Presenting Body | First Awarded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Board of Review | Viva Villa! | Fredric March (Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde) | National Board of Review | 1930 |
| Academy Awards | Cavalcade | Fredric March (Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde) | AMPAS | 1929 |
| New York Film Critics Circle | Not awarded until 1935 | Not awarded until 1935 | NYFCC | 1935 |
| Golden Globes | Not established | Not established | Hollywood Foreign Press | 1944 |
| Palme d'Or | Not awarded until 1946 | Not awarded until 1946 | Cannes Film Festival | 1946 |
This table illustrates how the National Board of Review was among the earliest U.S. organizations to formally recognize cinematic excellence. While the Oscars were already established, the NBR provided an alternative critical perspective, particularly influential in East Coast media circles. Its early start gave it credibility and helped shape national discourse on film quality during Hollywood’s formative sound era.
Why It Matters
The 1932 National Board of Review Awards remain significant for preserving the legacy of early 1930s cinema and validating performances that might otherwise have been overshadowed by later trends. These honors contributed to the professional recognition of actors like Fredric March and elevated genre films to the level of serious art.
- Critical Validation: The NBR’s endorsement helped solidify Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde as a landmark in horror cinema and psychological storytelling.
- Historical Record: The awards serve as a cultural snapshot, reflecting which films resonated with intellectual audiences during the early Depression years.
- Influence on Oscars: Fredric March’s NBR win preceded his Academy Award win, suggesting alignment between critical and industry recognition.
- Genre Legitimacy: Honoring a biographical action film like Viva Villa! demonstrated that serious drama could emerge from popular genres.
- Regional Perspective: As a New York-based organization, the NBR offered a counterpoint to the increasingly dominant Los Angeles film establishment.
- Enduring Legacy: The National Board of Review continues to issue annual awards, maintaining its role as a respected early-season Oscar predictor.
Today, the 1932 awards are remembered not only for their winners but for establishing a tradition of thoughtful, independent film criticism that continues to influence how cinema is evaluated and celebrated.
More What Is in History
Also in History
- Why is sipping a beverage with the little finger raised associated with the aristocracy--or upper-class pretensions
- Who was Alexander before Alexander
- How do I make sense of the dates of the Trojan War vs the dates of "Sparta"
- What does ad mean in history
- What does awkward mean
- Who Is Nikola Tesla
- Is it possible for a writing to survive in poland after the fall of soviet union
- Who was leading the discource around city planing and (auto-)mobility in the 50s, 60s and 70s
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.