What Is 2001 Army Black Knights football team
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Key Facts
- The 2001 Army Black Knights finished the season with a 3–8 overall record
- Bob Sutton was the head coach for the 2001 season, his fifth year in that role
- Army played their home games at Michie Stadium in West Point, New York
- The team competed as an independent in the NCAA Division I-A football season
- Quarterback Josh Schneider started multiple games and threw for 1,071 yards
Overview
The 2001 Army Black Knights football team represented the United States Military Academy during the 2001 NCAA Division I-A football season. Competing as an independent, the team was led by head coach Bob Sutton and played its home games at Michie Stadium in West Point, New York.
Despite high hopes following modest improvements in previous seasons, the 2001 campaign ended with a disappointing 3–8 record. The team struggled offensively and defensively, failing to secure a winning season for the fifth consecutive year under Sutton’s leadership.
- Record: The Black Knights finished the season with a 3–8 overall record, their worst since 1999 when they went 0–11.
- Head Coach: Bob Sutton served as head coach for his fifth season, maintaining a 17–49 record over his tenure by the end of 2001.
- Home Stadium: Michie Stadium, located on the West Point campus, hosted all of Army’s home games with a capacity of approximately 38,000.
- Offensive Leader: Quarterback Josh Schneider started nine games and threw for 1,071 yards and four touchdowns on the season.
- Key Loss: A 26–24 defeat to rival Navy in early December dropped Army to 3–8, marking their fourth loss in five years to the Midshipmen.
How It Works
The structure and operation of the Army Black Knights football program blend athletic competition with military discipline and service academy requirements. Players are cadets first, subject to rigorous academic and physical standards.
- Service Commitment: All players commit to serve in the U.S. Army after graduation, typically for five years, shaping team culture and priorities.
- Recruiting Limitations: Army cannot offer athletic scholarships in the same way as other schools; recruits must qualify academically and medically for West Point.
- Practice Schedule: The team balances full-time military training with football, often practicing fewer hours than Division I peers due to academic demands.
- Eligibility Rules: Cadets must maintain a strict GPA and pass physical fitness tests to remain eligible to play, adding pressure beyond the field.
- Navy Game Significance: The annual Army–Navy Game is a national event, steeped in tradition and often determining bragging rights among service academies.
- Independent Status: As an independent, Army does not belong to a conference, allowing scheduling flexibility but reducing postseason opportunities.
Comparison at a Glance
Below is a comparison of the 2001 Army Black Knights’ performance against key rivals and national averages in Division I-A football.
| Team | Overall Record | Points Per Game | Points Allowed Per Game | Head Coach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Army Black Knights | 3–8 | 18.5 | 30.1 | Bob Sutton |
| Navy Midshipmen | 2–10 | 15.8 | 31.5 | Charlie Weatherbie |
| Air Force Falcons | 7–5 | 28.7 | 21.6 | Fisher DeBerry |
| National Average (I-A) | N/A | 24.3 | 24.3 | N/A |
| Florida Gators | 10–2 | 30.6 | 19.2 | Steve Spurrier |
The table highlights Army’s struggles in 2001, as their 18.5 points per game ranked below the national average, while allowing 30.1 points per game placed them among the weakest defenses. In contrast, Air Force outperformed all service academies that year, qualifying for a bowl game.
Why It Matters
The 2001 season reflects a transitional period for Army football, illustrating the challenges of balancing athletic performance with the demands of military education. While the record was poor, the season contributed to long-term program evaluation and eventual coaching changes.
- Leadership Changes: Bob Sutton was fired after the 2003 season, making 2001 part of a declining trend that prompted future reforms.
- Recruiting Focus: Poor records in the early 2000s led Army to revamp its recruiting strategy, emphasizing dual-threat quarterbacks and disciplined defenders.
- Program Identity: The struggles reinforced the need for a distinct identity, later realized under coaches like Jeff Monken with a triple-option offense.
- National Exposure: Despite losses, Army maintained visibility through national broadcasts and the storied Army–Navy Game, preserving fan support.
- Cadet Development: The season emphasized character and perseverance, core values even in losing seasons, shaping future military leaders.
- Historical Context: The 2001 team is remembered as part of a rebuilding era, preceding modest improvements in the late 2000s and 2010s.
Though not a successful season by win-loss standards, the 2001 Army Black Knights played a role in shaping the program’s future direction and resilience.
More What Is in Sports
Also in Sports
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.