What Is 2004 Tulane Green Wave football
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Key Facts
- 2004 Tulane Green Wave finished with a 5–6 overall record
- Team played home games at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans
- Chris Scelfo was head coach for the fourth consecutive season
- Competed in Conference USA's West Division
- Recorded three conference wins and three non-conference losses
Overview
The 2004 Tulane Green Wave football team represented Tulane University in the 2004 NCAA Division I-A football season. Led by head coach Chris Scelfo, the team played as a member of Conference USA and competed in the West Division, striving to improve on previous seasons' performances.
Despite showing flashes of potential, the Green Wave finished the season with a 5–6 overall record and a 3–4 mark in conference play. The team played its home games at the Louisiana Superdome due to the limited capacity and infrastructure of their on-campus facility.
- Head coach Chris Scelfo was in his fourth season at the helm, aiming to rebuild the program after Hurricane Katrina’s indirect effects on recruiting and facilities.
- The team played five home games at the Louisiana Superdome, a neutral-site venue that hosted Tulane games from 1975 to 2013.
- Quarterback Lester Ricard emerged as a key offensive leader, throwing for 1,843 yards and 10 touchdowns during the season.
- Tulane’s defense struggled, allowing an average of 31.5 points per game, among the highest in Conference USA.
- The season included a notable 34–31 overtime win against UAB on October 30, marking one of the team’s most dramatic victories.
Season Performance
The 2004 campaign was marked by inconsistency on both offense and defense, with the Green Wave often battling close games but failing to secure a winning record. Despite high hopes entering the season, Tulane fell short of bowl eligibility for the third consecutive year.
- September 4, 2004: Opened the season with a 28–14 loss to Louisiana Tech, signaling early offensive struggles.
- September 18: Secured a 24–17 win over Army, showcasing improved ball control and defensive discipline.
- October 9: Lost 31–21 to Southern Miss in a key Conference USA matchup, highlighting defensive vulnerabilities.
- November 6: Suffered a 34–17 defeat to Houston, a game in which Tulane committed three turnovers.
- November 20: Concluded the regular season with a 38–28 loss to East Carolina, ending any slim bowl hopes.
- Final record: 5–6 overall and 3–4 in Conference USA play, missing postseason play by one win.
Comparison at a Glance
Comparing the 2004 Tulane Green Wave to peer programs in Conference USA reveals their mid-tier standing in the division. The table below highlights key statistical and competitive benchmarks.
| Team | Overall Record | Conference Record | Points Scored | Points Allowed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tulane | 5–6 | 3–4 | 229 | 347 |
| East Carolina | 5–6 | 4–3 | 272 | 276 |
| UAB | 5–6 | 4–3 | 224 | 247 |
| Marshall | 7–5 | 5–2 | 305 | 234 |
| SMU | 3–9 | 2–5 | 189 | 327 |
The data shows Tulane ranked near the middle of the West Division, outperforming only SMU in wins but trailing peers like UAB and East Carolina in conference success. While offensive output was moderate, defensive lapses significantly impacted outcomes.
Why It Matters
The 2004 season was a transitional chapter in Tulane football history, reflecting broader challenges in sustaining competitiveness during a period of coaching instability and limited resources. It laid groundwork for future rebuilding efforts under new leadership.
- The season underscored the need for improved defensive recruiting, as the unit allowed over 30 points in seven games.
- Chris Scelfo’s tenure, including 2004, highlighted the difficulty of maintaining momentum in a competitive conference.
- Playing at the Louisiana Superdome limited home-field advantage compared to on-campus stadiums.
- The close losses emphasized the importance of fourth-quarter execution and red-zone efficiency.
- Player development, particularly of QB Lester Ricard, provided a foundation for future offensive schemes.
- Missed bowl eligibility extended a five-year postseason drought that lasted until 2006.
Ultimately, the 2004 season serves as a case study in the challenges mid-major programs face in achieving consistent success, balancing academic standards, and competing in a demanding football landscape.
More What Is in Sports
Also in Sports
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.