What Is 2013-14 NHL fines and suspensions
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Key Facts
- $1,059,500 was the total amount fined during the 2013-14 NHL season
- There were 39 separate fine incidents recorded in the season
- No players received suspensions from the NHL Department of Player Safety
- The largest single fine was $100,000 issued to Evander Kane
- Fines were governed under the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and enforced by Brendan Shanahan
Overview
The 2013-14 NHL season marked a unique chapter in league disciplinary history, as it became the first full season without any formal suspensions issued by the NHL Department of Player Safety. Instead, the league relied heavily on monetary fines to address on-ice infractions, signaling a shift in enforcement strategy.
This approach drew attention from fans, media, and players alike, as it contrasted with previous seasons that saw multiple suspensions for dangerous plays. The absence of suspensions raised questions about consistency and deterrence in player conduct management.
- Evander Kane received the largest single fine of the season—$100,000—for making an obscene gesture toward Winnipeg Jets fans after a loss.
- Tom Sestito was fined $2,500 for an illegal check to the head of an opponent during a game against the New York Islanders.
- Raffi Torres avoided suspension but was fined $50,000 for a hit during the preseason, highlighting the league’s reliance on fines over bans.
- A total of 39 separate fine incidents were recorded, amounting to $1,059,500 in penalties across the league.
- The NHL Department of Player Safety, led by Brendan Shanahan, emphasized consistency and deterrence through financial penalties rather than missed games.
How It Works
The NHL’s disciplinary system operates under the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), which outlines procedures for handling dangerous plays, verbal misconduct, and off-ice behavior. Fines are assessed by the Department of Player Safety based on severity, intent, and repeat offenses.
- Illegal Check to Head: Tom Sestito was fined $2,500 for targeting the head of Kyle Okposo; the hit occurred at high speed and violated Rule 48.
- Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Evander Kane’s $100,000 fine stemmed from directing an offensive gesture at fans, a rare off-ice disciplinary action.
- Preseason Hit: Raffi Torres was fined $50,000 for a lateral blow to the head of Marian Hossa, avoiding suspension due to mitigating factors.
- High-Sticking: Several players received fines ranging from $2,000 to $5,000 for high-sticking infractions deemed deliberate or injurious.
- Repeat Offender Status: Players with prior disciplinary records faced higher fines, though no escalations resulted in suspensions this season.
- Fine Caps: Under the CBA, maximum fines are capped at $100,000 for a single incident, which Kane’s penalty reached.
Comparison at a Glance
Below is a comparison of disciplinary actions between the 2013-14 season and the two prior seasons:
| Season | Total Fines (USD) | Number of Fines | Suspensions Issued | Largest Fine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | $728,000 | 28 | 6 | $100,000 |
| 2012-13 | $892,000 | 31 | 8 | $70,000 |
| 2013-14 | $1,059,500 | 39 | 0 | $100,000 |
| 2014-15 (partial) | $310,000 | 12 | 2 | $50,000 |
| 2015-16 | $980,000 | 34 | 4 | $65,000 |
The data shows a clear spike in fines during 2013-14, with the highest total amount and number of incidents. Despite increased financial penalties, the complete absence of suspensions was a major departure from prior years and sparked debate about the effectiveness of fines alone in curbing dangerous play.
Why It Matters
The disciplinary approach during the 2013-14 season had lasting implications for player accountability, league reputation, and fan perception. It underscored the NHL’s attempt to balance player safety with competitive integrity while navigating complex labor agreements.
- The lack of suspensions raised concerns about whether fines alone were sufficient deterrents against dangerous hits.
- Teams and players criticized the inconsistency in rulings, especially when repeat offenders avoided game bans.
- Fans debated whether the league prioritized entertainment over safety by avoiding player absences.
- The $100,000 fine cap limited the league’s ability to penalize extreme misconduct beyond a single threshold.
- Media scrutiny intensified, with analysts questioning the Department of Player Safety’s decision-making transparency.
- This season became a case study in disciplinary policy, influencing future revisions to suspension and fine structures in later CBA negotiations.
Ultimately, the 2013-14 season remains a notable anomaly in NHL history—a year where financial penalties replaced time-based sanctions entirely, prompting long-term reflection on how best to enforce rules and protect players.
More What Is in Daily Life
Also in Daily Life
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.