What Is 2013 Ohio Bobcats football team
Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Key Facts
- Finished the season with a 4–8 overall record and 3–5 in MAC play
- Head coach Frank Solich led the team in his 14th season at Ohio
- Played home games at Peden Stadium, which has a capacity of 24,000
- Scored 249 total points (averaging 20.8 per game) and allowed 355
- Lost to Buffalo 24–23 in a key October 12 matchup
Overview
The 2013 Ohio Bobcats football team represented Ohio University during the 2013 NCAA Division I FBS football season. Competing in the Mid-American Conference (MAC) East Division, the team struggled to maintain consistency under longtime head coach Frank Solich, who was in his 14th season at the helm.
Despite high hopes following a 9–4 record in 2012, the Bobcats regressed, finishing with a 4–8 overall record and 3–5 in conference play. The season was marked by narrow losses and offensive inefficiency, contributing to a disappointing campaign.
- Final record: The team ended the season at 4–8 overall and 3–5 in MAC play, failing to qualify for a bowl game.
- Head coach:Frank Solich led the team for the 14th consecutive year, seeking to rebuild momentum after a strong 2012 season.
- Home stadium: The Bobcats played at Peden Stadium in Athens, Ohio, a venue with a capacity of approximately 24,000 spectators.
- Scoring output: Ohio scored 249 total points during the season, averaging 20.8 points per game, below the national FBS average.
- Defensive struggles: The defense allowed 355 total points, averaging 29.6 points per game, highlighting significant vulnerability in close contests.
Season Performance
The 2013 season was defined by missed opportunities and inconsistent quarterback play. The offense fluctuated between quarterbacks Tyler Tettleton and freshman Parker Navarro, leading to instability in the passing game.
- Quarterback rotation:Tyler Tettleton started the season but was eventually replaced by Parker Navarro, who showed flashes of potential but lacked experience.
- Key loss: A 24–23 defeat to Buffalo on October 12 proved pivotal, as Ohio failed to secure a critical MAC East win.
- Rivalry outcome: The Bobcats lost to rival Miami (OH) 27–21, missing a chance to boost their conference standing.
- Non-conference challenges: Early losses to Pittsburgh (38–34) and Florida A&M (27–20) exposed defensive weaknesses.
- Final game: The season concluded with a 45–21 loss to Toledo, confirming a losing record and no postseason appearance.
Comparison at a Glance
Here’s how the 2013 season compared to the previous year in key statistical categories:
| Statistic | 2012 Season | 2013 Season |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Record | 9–4 | 4–8 |
| MAC Record | 6–2 | 3–5 |
| Points Scored (Total) | 376 | 249 |
| Points Allowed (Total) | 274 | 355 |
| Bowl Game | Yes (Independence Bowl) | No |
The decline from 2012 to 2013 was stark, with Ohio losing key offensive contributors and failing to adapt defensively. The drop in scoring and increase in points allowed reflected broader team-wide struggles.
Why It Matters
The 2013 season marked a turning point in Ohio’s football trajectory, highlighting the challenges of sustaining success in the competitive MAC. It underscored the need for quarterback development and defensive cohesion.
- Program momentum: The downturn after a 9–4 season in 2012 hurt recruiting momentum and fan engagement.
- Coaching evaluation: Despite Solich’s tenure, questions arose about offensive scheme stagnation and player development.
- Quarterback transition: The shift from Tettleton to Navarro signaled a rebuilding phase at QB, impacting short-term performance.
- Conference competitiveness: The MAC East remained tight, and Ohio’s inability to win close games cost a potential division title.
- Stadium legacy: Peden Stadium, one of the oldest FBS venues, continued to host games despite modest attendance fluctuations.
- Historical context: The 2013 season is remembered as a regression year in an otherwise stable era under Solich.
While not a banner year, the 2013 campaign provided lessons that influenced future roster and strategic decisions. It remains a case study in the volatility of college football success, especially at the mid-major level.
More What Is in Sports
Also in Sports
More "What Is" Questions
Trending on WhatAnswers
Browse by Topic
Browse by Question Type
Sources
- WikipediaCC-BY-SA-4.0
Missing an answer?
Suggest a question and we'll generate an answer for it.