What Is 2016 Cornell Big Red football team

Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.

Last updated: April 15, 2026

Quick Answer: The 2016 Cornell Big Red football team represented Cornell University during the 2016 NCAA Division I FCS football season, finishing with a 3–7 overall record and 2–5 in Ivy League play under head coach David Archer, who was in his fourth season.

Key Facts

The 2016 Cornell Big Red finished the season with a 3–7 overall record
They went 2–5 in Ivy League competition
Head coach David Archer was in his fourth season at the helm
The team played home games at Schoellkopf Field in Ithaca, NY
Cornell scored 189 total points, averaging 18.9 per game

Overview

The 2016 Cornell Big Red football team represented Cornell University in the NCAA Division I Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) as part of the Ivy League. Competing under head coach David Archer, the team played its home games at Schoellkopf Field in Ithaca, New York, a historic venue with a capacity of approximately 25,500.

This season marked Archer’s fourth year leading the program, and the team aimed to improve on its 4–6 record from 2015. While the Big Red showed flashes of competitiveness, they ultimately struggled to maintain consistency across the season, finishing with a losing record and placing near the bottom of the Ivy League standings.

Season record: The team finished with a 3–7 overall record, including a 2–5 mark in Ivy League play, placing sixth in the conference.
Head coach: David Archer, in his fourth season, led the team with a developing roster focused on long-term growth rather than immediate dominance.
Home stadium: All home games were played at Schoellkopf Field, a campus stadium known for its steep grandstands and challenging conditions for visiting teams.
Offensive output: Cornell scored 189 total points during the season, averaging 18.9 points per game, ranking them near the bottom of the FCS in scoring offense.
Defensive performance: The defense allowed 27.4 points per game, highlighting struggles in containing opposing offenses throughout the season.

How It Works

The Ivy League operates under unique football guidelines compared to other FCS conferences, emphasizing academic integration and limiting postseason play. Understanding how the 2016 Cornell team functioned requires examining key structural and competitive elements of Ivy League football.

Ivy League rules:The Ivy League does not participate in the FCS playoffs, meaning teams like Cornell play a 10-game regular season with no chance at a national championship.
Schedule structure:Teams play a fixed 10-game schedule against fellow Ivy members and select non-conference opponents, with no conference championship game.
Recruiting standards:Admissions standards are highly selective, limiting the pool of eligible athletes compared to other FCS programs, which affects roster depth and talent level.
Player development:Emphasis is placed on four-year player growth, with most athletes developing over their college careers rather than arriving as elite recruits.
Coaching continuity:David Archer maintained a stable staff, focusing on consistent offensive and defensive schemes despite limited win totals in the mid-2010s.
Game management:Decisions often prioritize long-term development over short-term wins, especially in close games involving younger players.

Comparison at a Glance

Below is a comparison of the 2016 Cornell Big Red with other Ivy League teams and national FCS averages:

Team	Overall Record	Conference Record	Points Per Game	Points Allowed Per Game
Cornell	3–7	2–5	18.9	27.4
Princeton	4–6	3–4	22.1	24.3
Harvard	4–6	3–4	23.7	22.8
Columbia	3–7	2–5	19.8	26.9
FCS Average	N/A	N/A	26.5	25.1

The 2016 Cornell team ranked near the bottom of the Ivy League in both scoring and defense. While Columbia matched Cornell’s record, the Big Red’s offensive struggles were more pronounced than most peers. Compared to the FCS average, Cornell fell short in nearly every statistical category, reflecting the challenges of competing in a league with strict academic standards and limited scholarships.

Why It Matters

The 2016 season exemplifies the broader challenges and values of Ivy League football, where athletic performance is balanced with academic excellence. While the win-loss record was disappointing, the season contributed to long-term program development under David Archer.

Player development:Young quarterbacks and skill players gained critical experience, laying the foundation for future seasons.
Recruiting momentum:Competitive games against top Ivy teams helped attract recruits despite academic restrictions.
Conference parity:Close losses indicated narrowing gaps between top and bottom teams in the Ivy League.
Academic-athletic balance:The season reinforced Cornell’s commitment to scholar-athletes, prioritizing graduation and classroom success.
Program trajectory:Archer’s fourth year showed incremental progress compared to earlier 2–8 and 3–7 seasons.
Historical context:The 2016 team continued a rebuilding phase after a long Ivy title drought dating back to 1988.

Though not a standout year in terms of wins, the 2016 Cornell Big Red football season played a role in shaping the future of the program within the unique context of Ivy League athletics.