Why do sjp and kim feud

Content on WhatAnswers is provided "as is" for informational purposes. While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees. Content is AI-assisted and should not be used as professional advice.

Last updated: April 8, 2026

Quick Answer: The feud between SJP (Sarah Jessica Parker) and Kim Cattrall stems from longstanding tensions during their time on 'Sex and the City' (1998-2004) and its films, with specific conflicts emerging around 2017-2018. Parker reportedly earned $3 million per episode for the revival series 'And Just Like That...' (2021), while Cattrall declined to participate, citing disagreements over salary and working conditions. The feud escalated publicly in 2017 when Cattrall criticized Parker's response to her brother's death, and again in 2022 when Cattrall expressed frustration over being asked about a potential return. Industry reports suggest Parker's higher earnings and creative control contributed to the rift, with Cattrall seeking better compensation and respect.

Key Facts

The feud originated during 'Sex and the City' (1998-2004), where Parker was the lead and Cattrall played Samantha Jones.
In 2017, Cattrall publicly criticized Parker after Parker offered condolences for Cattrall's brother's death, calling it 'a painful reminder' of their strained relationship.
Parker earned $3 million per episode for 'And Just Like That...' (2021), while Cattrall declined to join, reportedly due to salary disputes and past conflicts.
Cattrall stated in 2022 she was 'never asked' to return for the revival and felt 'bullied' into discussing it, highlighting ongoing tensions.
The feud reflects broader issues in Hollywood, such as pay equity and on-set dynamics, with Cattrall seeking better treatment and compensation compared to Parker's higher status.

Overview

The feud between Sarah Jessica Parker (SJP) and Kim Cattrall is a high-profile conflict that emerged from their collaboration on the HBO series 'Sex and the City' (1998-2004) and its subsequent films. Parker played the lead role of Carrie Bradshaw, while Cattrall portrayed Samantha Jones, a character known for her bold personality. During the show's original run, tensions reportedly began due to differences in salary, screen time, and public perception, with Parker often receiving more attention as the star. After the series ended, the cast reunited for two films: 'Sex and the City' (2008) and 'Sex and the City 2' (2010), where conflicts simmered, particularly around Cattrall's demands for higher pay and creative input. By 2017, the feud became public when Cattrall criticized Parker's response to personal matters, and it intensified with the 2021 revival 'And Just Like That...', from which Cattrall was absent. This history spans over two decades, involving media scrutiny, fan reactions, and industry discussions about fairness in entertainment.

How It Works

The mechanisms behind the SJP-Kim feud involve a combination of professional disagreements, personal dynamics, and media amplification. Professionally, it centers on compensation and role disparities: Parker, as the lead, negotiated higher salaries and had more creative control, while Cattrall felt undervalued, leading to contract disputes during the films and revival. For example, in negotiations for 'And Just Like That...', Parker secured $3 million per episode, whereas Cattrall sought better terms but ultimately declined, citing unresolved issues. Personally, the feud is fueled by public statements and perceived slights, such as Cattrall's 2017 comments about Parker's insincerity, which turned private tensions into a media spectacle. The process includes media outlets amplifying conflicts through interviews and social media, with fans and critics taking sides, exacerbating the rift. Additionally, Hollywood's competitive environment and gender dynamics play a role, as both actresses navigate expectations and power imbalances, making reconciliation challenging without addressing underlying grievances like respect and equity.

Why It Matters

The SJP-Kim feud matters because it highlights broader issues in the entertainment industry, such as pay inequality, on-set relationships, and the impact of public feuds on careers and fan culture. It underscores how conflicts between co-stars can affect productions, as seen with Cattrall's absence from 'And Just Like That...', which altered the show's dynamic and disappointed some viewers. Real-world, it sparks conversations about fairness in Hollywood, encouraging discussions on negotiating power and treatment of supporting actors. The feud also has commercial significance, influencing viewership and media coverage, with potential effects on brand endorsements and future projects. Ultimately, it serves as a case study in managing professional relationships in the public eye, reminding audiences of the human elements behind celebrity personas and the importance of addressing workplace dynamics to foster collaboration and respect.